Screen.width * 0.7) {this.resized = true; this.width = screen.width * 0.7; this.style.cursor = ' hand '; this.alt = ' Click here to open new window\nCTRL + Mouse wheel to zoom in/out ';} "onclick =" if (! this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open (' http://img2.zol.com.cn/product/3/816/cexj2hecfmxde.jpg ');} "src =" http://img2.zol.com.cn/product/3/816/cexj2hecfmxde.jpg "onload =" if (this.width > screen.width * 0.7) {this.resized = true; this.width = screen.width * 0.7; this.alt = ' Click here to open new window\nCTRL + Mouse wheel to zoom in/out ';} "border =" 0 "alt =" "/> comparison of two interfaces
Intel said UDI is designed to replace traditional D-Sub i.e. VGA interface. However, before the advent of the DVI interface, a lot of people in the industry that will quickly replace DVI VGA interfaces, but the VGA interface remains one of the standard interfaces of the video, and DVI is only 30% market share. And compared to the current HDMI, Intel's UDI interface removed sound transmission function. Currently HDMI and UDI interface enables you to manage output HDCP content. Intel is now developing 0.8 UDI specification details, details of the final version 1.0 will develop in the second quarter. Allegedly, UDI interface prices cheaper than HDMI, manufacturers need only pay 1 million per year for 5 thousand dollars ' worth of the annual fee only, without the need for each pay equity UDI products.
No comments:
Post a Comment